Germaine Greer's Happy Squid review 2006

Hello. I'm Professor Germaine Greer. During the course of my distinguished career, I've been forced to wade through some truly execrable dross. However, very few of the nuggets of cultural dung that I've dissected in the past come even close to being quite as repugnant as the so-called "Happy Squid". The language is incoherent, the illustrations (with some notable exceptions) are laughably inept, and overarching themes are notable only by their absence. It's as if the entries are regurgitated on to the page without forethought or planning, and the structure has become more and more slapdash as time has worn on.
In the early posts, there is at least some sense of continuity, with comments on internet culture leading into confusing, irrelevant discussion of board games and onwards (by way of David Icke, of all people) towards Testoni, Garros and Hawk's inadequacies with members of the opposite sex. The first two, we are told, are incapable of so simple a task as making a purchase in a newsagents without suffering crises of sexuality, while the latter cheerfully admits to book-burning, the ultimate expression of illiteracy. I wonder if this Hawk character has any idea what a metaphor is. I do: I'm Professor Germaine Greer. I might have already mentioned that.
From this point on, post follows post in an entirely illogical manner. For example, Vinnie Jones is roped in to offer highly dubious romantic advice. I know Vinnie quite well, and I can say with confidence that the kind of sexism evident in his Happy Squid contribution is entirely out of character. I can only assume that his comments were taken out of context; they may even have been partially fabricated, since I remain to be convinced of the blog's journalistic integrity. This is followed over the months by succession of celebrity interviews and transcripts of their conversations. These are mainly posted by Testoni, who remains evasive about his sources, so their veracity is in some doubt. The hot-blooded response of Andy Murray to Testoni's taunting seems quite plausible, however. Other victims include: Tim Wheeler from Ash dispensing nonsensical martial-arts guidance; Boris Johnson and Jamie Oliver debating government policy whilst locked in a cupboard; American Beauty writer Alan Ball selling the rights to Six Feet Under to some suspiciously unenlightened Australians; George Galloway and Tommy Sheridan talking utter bollocks; David Beckham attempting to stimulate youngsters' interest in fluid dynamics; and J. J. Abrams pitching for the next Bond film. Most of these pieces descend into farce, and contribute nothing to the sum of human understanding. I find it appalling that such serious minds and respected role-models should be represented in this inane way, but the lack of discernment and concentration among internet surfers allows such transgressions to go unpunished, I imagine. Terrible.
Worse still is the complete absence of female input to the blog's content. Women are portrayed either as terrifyingly unapproachable figures of fear (quite right too) or as hapless, acquisitive bit-players. This duality of representation is presumably indicative of the authors' total sexual confusion and inadequacy; perhaps there's too much soy in their diets. Testoni in particular seems utterly perplexed by female influences, while simultaneously struggling to define himself as a man. A fifteen per cent man with an acute fear of women must indeed struggle in social situations, which presumably explains why he has so much time to devote to spewing his cretinous mind-puke over his unfortunate readers. He's also a massively regressive individual, claiming to be in his mid twenties, and yet resorting to Lego as his chosen medium for story telling.
The first of these Lego creations is the charmlessly juvenile Pirates. If the blurry, over-lit photography isn't enough to send you running for the Ikea catalogue, the pointless "plot" and anachronistic dialogue will do the trick. Eighteenth century sea-dogs should not be speaking like P. G. Wodehouse characters, and they certainly shouldn't be alluding to Beautiful South singles from 1989. It's sloppily researched, poorly conceived and entirely offensive to feminist readers. The token female pirate, Nigella, is fatuous, rash and obstinate, which of course is totally unlike any woman I have ever met. Sickening.
The second tale to be told through the medium of Danish plastic bricks is a superfluous retelling of Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (navigate to parts 2 and 3 from the "previous posts" list on the top right of the page). This Kevin Costner classic was one of my all-time favourite films until this lobotomised remake tarnished its purity. If it weren't for the fact that Testoni is clearly a joyless idea-leech, I'd be tempted to say that there's an air of flippancy in the story, which is not at all appropriate for material of such gravitas. The characterisation is hopelessly weak: the evil witch has a bunch of red flowers protruding from her head, this cheery floral adornment presumably being synonymous with wicked misanthropy in the writer's underdeveloped mind. Once more, the female presence is minimal, but Maid Marian is reduced to a simpering damsel in distress. Why couldn't it have been more like Tony Robinson's brilliant Maid Marian and her Merry Men, where Marian was in charge? Instead, we're expected to make do with some lyrics from the theme tune of this wondrous television programme being guilelessly shoehorned into the dialogue. A missed opportunity, and an unsightly blemish on the reputation of a cinematic great.
Testoni's iconoclastic butchery spreads beyond the world of film, however. On several occasions he takes it upon himself to experiment with poetry. The excruciatingly dreadful A Cautionary Poem about Drugs provides lucid testament to his lack of rhythm, rhyme and knowledge of his chosen subject matter. I quote:
And I'm sorry if this seems depressing
But herein lies a valuable lesson
About not doing weed, speed, acid, smack, crack
Or crystal meth
Or skunk, junk, crunk, Ker-Plunk
Cleary his fixation with childish games permeates even his efforts to tackle serious subject matter. As for My Heart is in Prison After Cardiac Arrest, I refer you to my comments above about confused sexuality. Here's a sample for those of you with strong stomachs:
I had a dream featuring John Nettles
In a bath full of red rose petals
And I don't wish to seem to be griping
But he was wiping himself with my flannel
And the flowers were blocking the piping
And beginning to stain the enamel
"This is how we bathe in Midsomer!" he cried
"In that case, I'd best call the plumber," I replied
I feel nauseous just thinking about it, and not just because of the inconsistent rhyme-scheme and metre.
There's also some more pop-based rhyming from All Saints, but I'm above such frippery. Money mad, those girls:
I’m no saver
But I’m sure I ain’t done nothing wrong
Do me a favour:
Wedge a few banknotes in my thong
Nice to see this successful girl-group doing their bit for the fight against negative female stereotyping (that was a sarcastic comment, by the way, you thickos).
The Happy Squid also features some drawings. These are divided into two categories: good (the ones by Garros) and pitiful (scrawled by Testoni, who can't even be bothered to colour them in). This poster by Garros is so good that I'm going to have it printed on a t-shirt and wear it on Starkey's Last Word. This one (visual Happy Mondays tribute) and this one (the Beard of Destiny) are brilliant, too. The less said about this one (constant, do you see?), though, the better. Let alone this one (a slow day for ideas, even by Testoni's non-exacting standards).
All of the above constitutes a fairly comprehensive round-up, except for a of rogue entry by acclaimed novelist and thinker, Ian McEwan. It goes on for ages, and I doubt anybody's actually read it, but I'd advise you to give it a go if you enjoyed his last book, Saturday. Material from a Booker Prize-winning author is an oasis of articulate wisdom on this website of linguistic horrors, and the spoon imagery is quite exquisite. For those who prefer their fiction with a flavour of nineteenth-century urban reality, a long-forgotten extract from an unpublished novel of the era provides an eye-opening snapshot of youth culture in the days before i-Pods and the culture of apathy. The Happy Squid is at its best when proper writers such as this are given the reins.
So that's it. Just enough time left to let Mark Kermode out of his box and ask him what he thought of the Happy Squid. What's that, Mark? You say that this site is clearly written by smart-arse students and recent graduates who aren't as clever as they think? You detect a hint of irony? You think it's supposed to be funny? Oh, Mark; you are contrary. Fancy crediting these blogging idiots with the capacity for independent thought. Get back in the box, or I'll make you go back and work for Radio 1. You don't want that, do you? People respect you now.
Good boy.
I've been Germaine Greer, completely disgusted. Happy New Year, you morons.




